Missile defence in Europe is evolving and maturing, even if it this is occurring at the margins of public debate. At the same time, there are perceptions that the missile threat is growing. A more sophisticated approach towards missile defence in Europe is required.
Why do young European-Arab Muslims, and converts, go to join the Islamic State (ISIS or Daesh) to fight or sacrifice themselves?
The Obama Administration has embarked on an intensive and costly nuclear modernisation programme, and on a new nuclear weapons race with Russia and China.
We have to avoid the spread of Islamophobia without losing sight of the challenge that both the Jihadists with their terrorist outrages and the Salafists with their anti-democratic preaching pose to open societies.
The terrorist threat to the EU from ISIS is a varied one. In the wake of what happened in Paris boils down the advice that we should ‘expect the unexpected’.
The deliberate targeting of, and indiscriminate attacks against, civilians are recurrent themes in present-day armed conflicts.
The clash between Saudi Arabia and Iran –two regional superpowers which are both theocracies– is the greatest geopolitical rivalry in the Middle East.
This crisis after the Paris attacks would have been a good opportunity to promote a common European defence policy against a common threat.
Three days after the coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris, the French President François Hollande said that ‘France is at war’.
20 - 26 of 42 pages