From the G20 to the G-Zero: global governance without Trump?
Is it possible a global governance without the US. Can the others continue managing the world without its collaboration and can the US act as it pleases?
Is it possible a global governance without the US. Can the others continue managing the world without its collaboration and can the US act as it pleases?
Europe appears to have overcome its fear of the future, although there is no consensus about what precisely that future may be.
This type of Europe of small things could help the societies of the EU and the Union itself to genuinely transcend national borders.
Global governance is no longer the exclusive province of nation states. Although they will continue to be crucial, they need the help of other actors.
Somehow or other, although no-one knows how, remedying the great decoupling will induce the vertical to become more horizontal again.
The terrorist threat ensures that NATO's front has a 360º circumference. The question is whether NATO is the right organisation for addressing the menace.
Underlying the cartography accompanying the New Silk Road initiative there is a whole series of geometries and latent geometrical suspicions.
The debate about social Europe has relaunched the social dimension as a way of reacting to the attacks from various populist quarters and the discontent.
In Emmanuel Macron, France has secured a pro-European President but in a society that is divided on the issue.
Is this business of networks a new Great Game that, rather than replacing the classic chessboard, adds new territory to it?
France has open wounds. Will Macron manage to bind them and push through reforms that have been put off for too long? This is the big issue.