|
Theme: Due to the economic crisis, from the beginning of the
new century many of Portugal’s former immigrants have moved on
to Spain and other European countries, in parallel with the increase in Portuguese emigration.
Summary: In the context of Southern Europe,
Portugal faces a singular situation. Similarly to Spain, Italy and
Greece, the country registered a strong immigration in the late 1990s.
However, in the early years of the new century immigration has
decreased. At the same time, emigration has continued and a new wave of
emigrants has left the country, mostly directed towards Spain. As
regards government policy, admission and integration have been
addressed but emigration
has not seriously been looked into.
Analysis
Introduction As in other southern European
countries, in recent decades Portugal has undergone a rapid transition
from net emigration to net immigration. The migration turnaround
occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, following the same trend as in Spain,
Italy and Greece. Similarly to most of its southern counterparts, the
bulk of the inflow has occurred since the late 1990s –although in
Portugal they decreased shortly after–. Many of the underlying factors
of this profound social change are common to the southern European
context, including a strong labour demand, an extensive informal
economy, higher aspirations of the local population and limited State
capacity to deal with inflows and welfare. A number of other factors
were specific to Portugal, such as its status as a colonial empire
until the 1970s and the lower pressure of direct immigration from
bordering countries. Another striking peculiarity is that, in tandem
with immigration, emigration from Portugal has never entirely ceased,
having resumed since the mid-1980s and, especially in the early years
of the new century.
Immigration Immigration to Portugal was
initially confined to citizens of Portuguese-speaking countries, namely
the African ex-colonies and Brazil, but later became progressively
diversified. Today, Portuguese-speaking immigrants are still in the
majority and are mainly from Cape Verde and Brazil, but other national
groups are
becoming more numerous, especially Eastern Europeans, particularly from
the Ukraine.
The short history of immigration to the country can be
divided into four periods. The first phase occurred between 1975 and
the mid-1980s. The revolution of 1974 was a turning point for
immigration. The collapse of the Portuguese empire brought Portuguese
returnees and other immigrants from the former colonies. The largest
flow came from Cape
Verde, continuing a trend that had already started in the late 1960s;
other significant flows came from Angola and Guinea Bissau.
The second phase, which started in 1986 with the entry
of Portugal into the EU and continued until the end of the 1990s, was
marked by an increase in immigration based on historical, linguistic,
cultural and colonial links (PALOP and Brazil) and by the persistence of emigration to Western Europe.
The third period started in the late 1990s, when there
was a massive inflow from Eastern Europe, which had no previous
cultural, historical or linguistic relations with Portugal, as well as
a stronger and renewed immigration from Brazil and a continued
diversification of national origins, particularly from Asia. The volume
of immigrants greatly exceeded the
previous phases and lasted until around 2004, when the overall number
of foreigners reached a peak.
Finally, the fourth phase began in the first years of
this decade, marked by the economic recession, and has continued until
the present day. The overall number of foreigners living in the country
declined slightly after 2004, with a significant drop in Eastern
Europeans, the stabilisation of African immigration and only Brazilian
immigration going strong, with new entries offsetting exits. As
confirmed by the decrease in the number of immigrants renewing their
legal permits and some sporadic evidence, it is known that many
individuals have left Portugal, opting for more dynamic labour markets,
including Spain, or returning to their home countries. The recent
worldwide economic
recession may have stabilised this scenario but not aggravated it,
since no alternative re-migration destinations are available.
In 2007 there were around 435,736 foreigners legally living in
Portugal (Figure 1), accounting for around 4% of the total
population
and around 5% of the labour force (not including irregular workers).
Brazilians (15.2%) and Cape Verdeans (14.7%) comprise the most numerous
groups, followed by Ukrainians (9.1%). This is a drastic change from
the situation in last few decades. In 2000 foreigners totalled 207,587,
having risen from only 107,767 in 1990. The ranking by nationalities is
also completely different from earlier immigration phases: Africans
lost their predominance, whilst Brazilians and Eastern Europeans became
more numerous.
Figure 1. Foreign population living legally in Portugal, by nationality, 1990-2007
| |
1990 (a) |
2000 (a) |
2007 (b) |
Nationality |
Total |
% |
Total |
% |
Total |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
107,767 |
100 |
207,587 |
100 |
435,736 |
100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
31,412 |
29.1 |
61,678 |
29.7 |
179,040 |
41.1 |
EU
(c) |
29,901 |
27.7 |
56,850 |
27.4 |
115,556 |
26.5 |
Germany |
4,845 |
4.5 |
10,385 |
5.0 |
15,498 |
3.6 |
Rumania |
– |
– |
– |
– |
19,155 |
4.4 |
Spain |
7,462 |
6.9 |
12,229 |
5.9 |
18,030 |
4.1 |
UK |
8,457 |
7.8 |
14,096 |
6.8 |
23,608 |
5.4 |
Other
EU |
9,137 |
8.5 |
20,140 |
9.7 |
39,265 |
9.0 |
Other
Europe |
1,511 |
1.4 |
4,828 |
2.3 |
63,484 |
14.6 |
Moldavia |
– |
– |
15 |
0.0 |
14,053 |
3.2 |
Ukraine |
– |
– |
163 |
0.1 |
39,480 |
9.1 |
Other |
– |
– |
4,281 |
2.1 |
9,951 |
2.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa |
45,255 |
42.0 |
98,769 |
47.6 |
147,959 |
34.0 |
PALOP |
43,297 |
40.2 |
93,506 |
45.0 |
136,694 |
31.4 |
Angola |
5,306 |
4.9 |
20,416 |
9.8 |
32,728 |
7.5 |
Cape
Verde |
28,796 |
26.7 |
47,093 |
22.7 |
63,925 |
14.7 |
Guinea
Bissau |
3,986 |
3.7 |
15,941 |
7.7 |
23,733 |
5.4 |
Mozambique |
3,175 |
2.9 |
4,619 |
2.2 |
5,681 |
1.3 |
São
Tomé Principe |
2,034 |
1.9 |
5,437 |
2.6 |
10,627 |
2.4 |
Other
Africa |
1,958 |
1.8 |
5,263 |
2.5 |
11,265 |
2.6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
26,369 |
24.5 |
37,590 |
18.1 |
83,592 |
19.2 |
North
America |
8,993 |
8.3 |
10,195 |
4.9 |
10,446 |
2.4 |
Canada |
2,058 |
1.9 |
1,975 |
1.0 |
1,849 |
0.4 |
USA |
6,935 |
6.4 |
8,022 |
3.9 |
8,264 |
1.9 |
Other |
0 |
0.0 |
198 |
0.1 |
333 |
0.1 |
Latin
America |
17,376 |
16.1 |
27,395 |
13.2 |
73,146 |
16.8 |
Brazil |
11,413 |
10.6 |
22,202 |
10.7 |
66,354 |
15.2 |
Venezuela |
5,145 |
4.8 |
3,494 |
1.7 |
3,199 |
0.7 |
Other |
818 |
0.8 |
1,699 |
0.8 |
3,593 |
0.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
and Oceania |
4,509 |
4.2 |
9,272 |
4.5 |
24,855 |
5.7 |
China |
– |
– |
3,281 |
1.6 |
10,448 |
2.4 |
Other |
– |
– |
5,991 |
2.9 |
14,407 |
3.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
222 |
0.2 |
278 |
0.1 |
290 |
0.1 |
(a) Residence permits.
(b) Residence permits (provisional data), extended stay permits and
extended long-term visas. Data on new long-term visas not included.
(c) From 1990 to 2000: EU-15; 2007: EU-27.
Source: INE and SEF.
Similarly to Portugal’s southern European
counterparts, most immigrant inflows are labour related. Immigrant
activity rates, both male and female, are higher than for natives.
Moreover, most of the recent inflows moved directly into low-skilled
jobs in sectors such as construction, hotels and food service
activities, services to companies and domestic service. The high
economic growth registered until the early years of the new century,
often based on
labour-intensive sectors, generated a high labour demand and exerted a
strong pull factor for immigration.
Immigrants are also over-exposed to flexible
arrangements, and the informal economy has always been a typical route
for their incorporation to the labour market. Despite a scarcity of
data in this respect, a large proportion of immigrants have entered the
country irregularly or overstayed, easily finding a job, often in the
irregular labour market. Only with time does their legal and social
condition improve.
Immigration Policy Since the 1980s the
Portuguese government has launched various policy initiatives to
regulate immigration and promote the integration of immigrants. The
process has been tentative and sometimes problematic. Immigrant inflows
vary in their rhythm and characteristics and many
contextual factors change over time, such as the entry of new members
to the EU.
During the 1980s and early 1990s immigration policy mainly focused on
the regulation of flows by the Aliens and Borders Service (SEF), dependent on the Interior Ministry. The pressure of irregular
migration, together with the country’s membership of the Schengen Agreement, forced the government to tighten its regulation
mechanisms in 1993 and launch the first extraordinary regularisation in 1992-93.
In the mid-1990s the scope of immigration policy was
extended. There was a shift from a policy based exclusively on the
regulation of flows to a policy aimed at integration issues. A second
extraordinary regularisation was launched in 1996 and a new immigration
law, approved in 1998, adopted a less restrictive approach. Regarding
institutional aspects, a decisive step was the creation in 1996 of the
post of High Commissioner for Immigration and Ethnic Minorities, the
first governmental position especially focused on the immigrant
population. Later, this entity has been expanded with the creation of
the currently designated High Commission for Immigration and
Intercultural Dialogue (ACIDI).
New developments in Portuguese immigration policy were
introduced in 2001, when immigration pressure was at its highest. For
the first time, a system of quotas was envisaged for the recruitment of
immigrants based on a report on domestic labour shortages. To work
legally in Portugal immigrants had to apply for a work visa at the
Portuguese consulate in their country of origin. The number of visas
had to match the job vacancies identified in the various economic
sectors (ie, quotas were set), as defined by research carried out
annually by the Institute of Employment and Vocational Training (IEFP),
a department of the Ministry of Labour. Besides, the new law created
‘stay permits’ (autorização de
permanência), a status that corresponded in practice to a new regularisation process.
After a further law in 2003, based on some of the
regulating principles of the previous one, and two specific
regularisation processes in 2003 and 2004, a new orientation was
approved in 2007. In order to regulate immigration, the 2007 law
introduced a new system, known as ‘global contingent’, which sets out
the country’s total annual labour requirements. As regards
regularisation, there are now provisions to allow the ‘ordinary’
legalisation of formerly irregular situations. The requirements for
benefiting from this procedure include, among others, having an
employment contract or labour relation, being registered with the
social security and being a third-country minor born in Portugal who
has had
pre-school, basic, secondary or professional education.
On the whole, the attempts to regulate immigration have
not fulfilled their promise: the mechanisms for immigration control
until the late 1990s have not been successful and the quota system for
labour market recruitment launched in 2001 has not been very effective.
According to researchers and many public officials, the process is too
complex, bureaucratic and ineffective. In fact, formal quotas have not
been fulfilled and foreign workers continue to enter the Portuguese
labour market irregularly. As a result, the number of irregular
immigrants has always been considerable. Between 1992 and 2004 five
extraordinary regularisation programmes have been implemented, followed
by an ordinary provision in 2007 (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Regularisation processes, 1992-2007
Year |
1992-93 |
1996 |
2001 |
2003 |
2004 |
2007 |
Successful applicants |
39,166 |
35,082 |
183,833 |
16,173 |
NA |
NA |
Legal title |
Residence permits |
Residence permits |
Stay permits |
Work visas |
Work visas |
Residence permits |
Source: SEF.
Policies as regards integration seem to have been much
more effective. The fact that Portugal is highly placed in a recent
comparative migrant integration policy index (MIPEX) confirms the
relative success of its policies.
Emigration During recent decades, the
persistence of out-migration is one of the most prominent singularities
of the Portuguese case. In the new century there has been a significant
volume of re-emigration of foreign immigrants (mainly directed to
Spain), as suggested by the decrease in the number of legal permits
renewed each year. The country’s sharp economic expansion at the turn
of the century soon ground to a halt, giving place to low job creation
and rising unemployment. At the same time, the out-migration of
Portuguese nationals has never ceased. The limited statistical evidence
for emigration suggests that permanent emigration (departures with an
intention of residence for periods longer than one year) had stabilised
at low levels since the 1980s, but that temporary emigration
(departures for less than one year) registered a strong increase until
the mid-1990s, maintaining a considerable volume from then on.
Comparing permanent to temporary outflows, the latter
acquired soon moved ahead and accounted for more than two-thirds of the
total in the early 2000s.
Official data on Portuguese emigration are subject to
serious limitations. The main source of information is an indirect
survey of emigrants’ dwellings and data are only available from 1992 to
2002. However, episodic research carried out since the 1990s confirms
the persistence of emigration and its renewal in specific periods. In
most cases, research is based on statistics available at the countries
of destination. The latter might not be totally reliable, but are the
best way to measure international migration in certain
cases, particularly in the intra-EU context.
Recent research confirms that, over the past few
decades, Portuguese out-migration saw a first upsurge between the
mid-1980s and late 1990s. In that period, emigration to Switzerland was
considerable, with a significant flow also going to Germany, the latter
linked to the construction boom after reunification. The German case is
interesting since it confirmed the importance of the mechanisms of free
provision of services inside the EU and the correlated importance of
posted workers (employees posted by enterprises to work temporarily in
another Member State). This case highlighted the fact that national
interests tend to mobilise against immigration, including intra-EU
flows, with German institutions, particularly trade unions, imposing
obstacles to limit the growth of inflows. Most of this new Portuguese
emigration was strictly temporary, although some became permanent since
temporary permits could be transformed
into permanent ones.
More recently, in the early 2000s, a new upsurge of
Portuguese emigration took place. Again, most of these flows seemed to
be directed to EU countries such as the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands
and Spain. Whether it is temporary or permanent is still to be
determined. Again, the most useful source of information are statistics
in the countries of destination, which confirm a gradual and strong
growth of inflows from Portugal, including Portuguese
citizens.
The case of Spain is particularly telling. According to data from the
Spanish Padrón Municipal,
the number of Portuguese citizens increased dramatically in the new
century, rising from less than 2,000 per year in 1998 to more than
25,000 in 2007. The links between Portuguese outflows directed to Spain
with the movement of former immigrants to Portugal to the latter
country is due to the contrast between the poor economic situation in
Portugal in the early years of the new century with the fast-growing
economy in Spain in the same period. This migration trend also
highlights the effect that an open EU border policy can have on labour
flows. The recent world economic crisis, which has hit Spain hard,
mighty have put a halt to
this flow.
Figure 3. Emigration from Portugal to Spain, 1998-2007

Source: Padrón Municipal (Spain).
Very little is known about the character of recent
Portuguese emigration and emigrants. Moreover, very few policies have
been adopted in this regard. Academic research has largely focused on
inflows and government attention has been directed to the more
stabilised Portuguese diaspora. The country seems to have put its faith
in modernisation and the concomitant turnaround from emigration to
immigration. But the traditional economic fabric of many regions, the
periods of economic restructuring (with, for instance, the textile and
footwear industries in the northern regions having been hard hit by
globalisation), the economic downturn, rising unemployment and the
State’s scant provision of financial support have all led to renewed
emigration. It is not surprising that
the new emigrants are mainly low- to medium-skilled workers who do the
same type of jobs abroad that foreign immigrants do in Portugal.
Conclusions: In the southern European context,
Portugal is in a unique position as international migration. Foreign
inflows started rapidly after the decolonisation process, grew
gradually until the late 1990s and boomed afterwards. The countries of
origin of immigrants, which were mostly Portuguese-speaking African
former colonies and Brazil in the 1980s, diversified afterwards to
include Eastern European and Asian countries with no former significant
connections to Portugal. After the early years of the new century
immigration decreased, with even some departures, following the
economic downturn and better job prospects in other European
countries such as Spain.
During this period there was a tentative process of
designing effective admission and integration policies. As in other
southern European countries, numerous policies were enacted which tried
to regulate inflows, control borders, integrate immigrants and
regularise irregular situations, but the efficacy of regulation
attempts was limited and large-scale irregular immigration persisted,
which was subsequently addressed by several regularisation programmes.
Integration mechanisms proved to be more reliable.
At the same time, however, Portuguese emigration
quietly continued its course. It first resumed after the mid-1980s and
was mainly directed to Switzerland, but it later diversified to other
EU countries, such as Germany, benefitting from the EU’s freedom of
circulation and provision of services. In the new century a surge in
emigration again became evident. This time Spain was the favoured
destination.
Emigration has persisted but no significant attention has been given to
it at the public, academic or policy levels.
João Peixoto and Catarina Sabino
Researchers at SOCIUS, School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical
University of Lisbon, Portugal
|