FOURTEENTH WAVE OF THE BAROMETER OF THE ELCANO ROYAL INSTITUTE (March 2006)
FAVOURABLE OPINION OF MERKEL AND ROYAL
Spain's pro-European attitude is unsinkable. Fifty-three percent continue to say they are in favour of the EU Constitutional Treaty,
versus 8% who oppose it. The problems that have arisen in the ratification process in France and Holland, and the resulting institutional
debate, have not affected Spanish opinion. In fact, 89% of those who voted in favour say they would do so again
%
VOTER INTENTION
In favour
Against
Spoiled ballot
Abstention
PAST VOTE
In favour
89
2
1
2
Against
3
85
1
4
Spoiled ballot
4
1
71
4
Abstention
19
6
31
51
Percentages in rows.
After
Kofi Annan was replaced as UN leader by Ban Ki-moon –a stranger for at least
60% of Spaniards–, Angela Merkel became the international leader seen in the
most favourable light by the Spanish. Her ranking rose half a point on a
scale of 0 to 10, from 5.5 to 6.1, putting her ahead even of Javier Solana,
who on this occasion was given a 6.
Also, 55% of respondents had a positive opinion of the German presidency of the
EU, compared with only 9% whose opinion of it was negative.
Germany’s image is also positive
on the whole.Seventy-six percent believe it is an essential EU country, and
35% agree that its influence in the EU has increased in recent times; however,
only 20% fear the spectre of Nazism and believe that ‘if Germany’s power continues to
grow in the 21st century, it could once again become a threat, as in the 20th
century’.
All
in all, 53% of Spaniards think that Germany has too much power in
the EU; and they also think this is true of France. By contrast, 68% do not think that
the latter is ‘a military power capable of counterbalancing US power in the world.’
Regarding
the immediate future of France, based on equal familiarity with Royal and Sarkozy
(half of Spaniards), the former received a score of 5.7, while
the latter was given 4.9 by Spanish respondents.
On
this matter, there are significant differences between the genders: women
gave a higher score to Ségolène Royal.
SPAIN CONSIDERS A NEW COLD WAR
On
the subject of European defence, given the fact that the US is able to deploy
missiles in Europe and that Russia is threatening to build missiles in
response, 54% of Spaniards ‘believe it is possible that a situation similar
to the Cold War could develop again’.
On
the subject of European defence, given the fact that the US is able to deploy
missiles in Europe and that Russia is threatening to build missiles in
response, 54% of Spaniards ‘believe it is possible that a situation similar
to the Cold War could develop again’.
Non-alignment
is consistent with the past, but also with the perception of the present. Only
24% feel that the US is a positive influence in the world –the same percentage
as for Russia–. This makes Spain one of the developed
countries most critical of both powers; however, Iran receives still more
criticism.
The
opinion of Iran is not surprising in
light of other facts. The percentage of Spaniards who are very concerned
about the development of nuclear arms in Iran has increased
significantly since December 2006, from 45% to 58%.
This
change makes Iran the second-biggest international concern
for Spaniards, at the same level as international terrorism.
THE THREAT OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM CONTINUES TO INCREASE
Most
Spanish respondents (43%) put the threat of international terrorism at the same
level as ETA terrorism, while in December 2006, before the attack in BarajasAirport, this opinion was shared
by only 20%.
Sixty-one
percent believe that the March 11 trials could lead to attacks against Spanish
interests in Muslim countries.
As a
result of this feeling of threat, 78% say that public spending on the fight
against international terrorism should be increased.
It is important to
emphasise that the Spanish differentiate clearly between Islamist terrorism
and Islam itself, and between moral and religious content; they are more
tolerant regarding the latter than the former.
Sixty-one percent of
Spaniards are against Muslim girls wearing a veil at school, versus 18% who are in favour. However, an
identical percentage is in favour (40%) and against (40%) Muslims being able to
use the Córdoba mosque (a Christian cathedral since the 13th century) as Roman Catholics
do.
There
is reason to suppose that ‘islamophobia’ is not common in Spain, that is, intolerance to a particular
religion –in this case Islam–; rather, there is a growing secularism that
affects all religions, since only 46% are clearly in favour of Catholic
crucifixes being displayed in schools.
Along
these same lines, only 25% oppose Muslim residents in Spain being able to vote in
municipal elections.
As a
result, the fear of radical Islam has not led to a rejection of Islam as a
whole. Terrorism is not so much attributed to ideological factors as to
international politics. Sixty-five percent believe that the threat of
international terrorism in the world is greater than before the invasion of
Afghanistan –59% say this is true for Spain in particular–.
GROWING DANGER FOR SPANISH TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN<
The negative news coming from Afghanistan, in particular that
of the death of a female Spanish soldier, have had an impact on public
opinion: 69% think the situation has worsened in recent months.
Regarding the future, the majority think it will worsen
(50%), while only 20% are optimistic. As a result, the percentage of Spaniards who consider
it ‘very dangerous’ has risen from 34% to 46% since December 2006, so that 9 out of 10
respondents see danger.
While in December 2006, 60% had a positive opinion of the mission, this percentage
has now dropped to 49%.
Overall, only 45% of respondents agree with a total withdrawal of troops, versus 49%
who say they should continue in Afghanistan; only 4% support an
increase in the contingent and the greatest percentage (34%) believe that Spain’s presence should be
maintained at current levels.
In line with the arguments defended by their respective political leaders, the
most support for withdrawal is found among those who voted for the left-wing IU
and for nationalist parties, while an increasing number of PP (Popular Party) voters
support keeping troop levels the same or raising them. PSOE (Socialist Party) voters
want them to remain the same or be reduced.
The refusal to increase the troop contingent is the result of a perception of
danger, but also of a deep-set feature of the Spanish attitude to foreign
policy: pacifism. Spanish respondents agree with increasing all areas of
international action, from diplomacy to foreign investment incentives to
intelligence services –absolutely all areas except military and defence
spending–.
INCREASING CONCERN REGARDING CLIMATE CHANGE
Eighty-six
percent agree that public spending should be increased to fight against climate
change. This
is a result of a significant increase in concern regarding global warming. The
percentage of Spaniards who consider it a very significant threat to Spain has risen from 60% to 70%
since the Paris meeting, the publication
of the UN report, the 5-minute blackout, etc.
However,
85% are against an increase in electricity rates, gas prices, etc.; 66%
oppose tax increases and 62% are against restrictions on consumption.
Ninety-two
percent are in favour of developing alternative sources of energy. Only 21% are
in favour of building more nuclear power plants to reduce dependence on foreign
energy supplies.
WHAT IS THE BAROMETER OF THE ELCANO
ROYAL INSTITUTE?
(ISSN 1696-330X)
From the outset, the Elcano Royal
Institute of International and Strategic Studies has paid special attention to
Spain’s image across the globe, making it one of our special areas of strategic
research. As part of this attention, we have set up what we call the OPIEX or
Permanent Observatory of Spain’s Image Abroad. The flipside of this, if you
pardon the expression, is an analysis of the Spanish public opinion on its
foreign policy and international relations, including the image Spaniards have
of other countries.
To measure this latter variable, we
designed the BRIE, Elcano Royal Institute Barometer. This is a periodic survey,
carried out three times a year, in November, February and June, of a sample of
1,200 people considered a fair cross section of the Spanish population. The
difference between the BRIE and other surveys carried out in Spain from time to
time, such as the Barometer of the Sociological Research Institute, is that the
BRIE focuses exclusively on opinions, values and attitudes regarding international
relations and Spanish foreign policy in all its aspects (defence policy, image
of foreign countries, attitudes towards the European Union, perception of
threats, possible conflicts, etc.).
The BRIE survey is structured in two
primary modules. On one hand, we have a set of questions, which, in total or in
part, are repeated in the three annual waves, that gives us a time series of a
group of basic parameters. This is the ‘fixed’ part of the BRIE. But the core
of the barometer is made up of the ‘variable’ part, comprising questions
relating to current, up-to-the-minute affairs, which obviously have to change
for each wave.